ECHO · 05 BETA v0.7 · 100% IN-BROWSER
◆ Live signature
Rising vs declining
◆ ECHO · 05 / TREND DETECTION BETA

WHAT'S
CHANGED
SINCE LAST
TIME?

Echo Signal compares two snapshots of aggregated public text from the same source, taken at different times, and surfaces what has shifted. Rising terms, declining terms, tone changes, topic emergence, cultural-driver migrations. Built for the question every strategist eventually asks: is the conversation moving — and where?

◆ PUBLIC BETA
This tool is in active development. Expect rough edges, occasional miscalibration on edge cases, and ongoing refinement. Your feedback shapes the next iteration. Use the signals as hypotheses to investigate, not as final findings.
v 0.7
PUBLIC BETA
◆ INPUT A
Earlier snapshot
Aggregated public text from period 1 — competitor copy from last year, press articles from Q1, public reviews from a previous quarter. Always plural, always public, never identifiable individuals.
◆ INPUT B
Recent snapshot
Same source type, same kind of aggregation, but from a more recent period. The comparison is only valid when sources are matched — apples to apples.
◆ OUTPUT
Differential analysis
What rose, what fell, what stabilized. Tonal shift across emotions. Cultural-value migration. Emerging vs disappearing topic clusters. Diagnostic, not predictive.
ZERO DATA RETENTION · ZERO INDIVIDUAL PROFILING. Echo Signal compares aggregated public texts, not individuals. Both snapshots must be aggregates from comparable sources. Everything runs in your browser. Nothing sent. Nothing stored. Close the tab and it's gone.
Snapshot T1
EARLIER · the baseline
0 words
Public, aggregated, comparable. Same type of source as snapshot T2 for valid comparison.
Examples: 10+ press articles from 2024 · 30+ public reviews from H1 · competitor homepages 6 months ago · public forum threads pre-event
Snapshot T2
RECENT · the comparison
0 words
Match T1 source type. If T1 is press articles, T2 must also be press articles, just newer.
Examples: 10+ press articles from 2026 · 30+ public reviews from current quarter · competitor homepages now · forum threads post-event
◆ detecting signal shifts across two snapshots...
◆ NO ANALYSIS YET Paste two snapshots of aggregated public text — same source type, different time periods.
Echo Signal will surface what's rising, what's declining, and where the conversation is moving.

◆ METHOD & LIMITS · READ BEFORE INTERPRETING

What this tool is. Echo Signal performs a differential analysis between two text corpora that represent the same source type at two different times. It surfaces frequency-shifted terms, tonal changes across Plutchik's emotional dimensions, and migrations across Schwartz value drivers. The math is straightforward: log-odds ratio for term frequency comparison (Monroe, Colaresi & Quinn, 2008), cosine distance for emotional vectors, percentage-point delta for value categories.

What this tool is not. Not a forecasting engine. Not a predictor of what will happen next. Not a substitute for proper market research or longitudinal studies. The output is descriptive — what changed between two specific text samples you provided — not predictive. A rising term in your sample does not guarantee that term will continue rising in the wider world.

How to read the scores. Treat differential signals as hypotheses to investigate further, not as findings. A 200% increase in a low-frequency term may be noise; a 30% increase in a high-frequency term is usually substance. The velocity score reflects how much of the conversation's vocabulary has changed — high velocity means more flux, not necessarily more importance.

Source matching is critical. The single biggest source of error is comparing apples to oranges — for instance, press articles from one publication in T1 against forum posts in T2. Always match: same publication type, same kind of public source, same approximate audience. Otherwise the "trend" you detect is just a source artifact.

Ethical use. Echo Signal is designed for marketers, strategists, journalists, and researchers analyzing changes in public discourse on topics, brands, or industries. It is not designed for, and should not be used for, tracking changes in the speech of identifiable individuals over time, monitoring private communications, or any application targeting specific persons. Both snapshots must be public aggregate texts.

◆ FOUNDATIONAL RESEARCH ·

→ Monroe, B. L., Colaresi, M. P., & Quinn, K. M. (2008). Fightin' words: Lexical feature selection and evaluation for identifying the content of political conflict. Political Analysis, 16(4), 372–403.
→ Pennebaker, J. W., & Stone, L. D. (2003). Words of wisdom: Language use over the life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 291–301.
→ Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65.
→ Plutchik, R. (1980). A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion.
→ Mohammad, S. M., & Turney, P. D. (2013). Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence, 29(3), 436–465.
→ Michel, J.-B., et al. (2011). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331(6014), 176–182. (cultural trend analysis methodology)
ECHO SIGNAL · THE LISTENING ROOM · © 2026 ALEX-GEORGE ADAM
← Back to The Listening Room · Echo Pulse · Echo Compass